latest stable versions: v150827 (changelog)

Old Forums (READ-ONLY): The community now lives at WP Sharks™. If you have an s2Member® Pro question, please use our new Support System.

About: Bob Kondek

Sorry, I've not written a description yet. I'll get to it soon!


Topics I'm Subscribed To

Viewing topic 1 (of 1 total)
Topic Count Last Reply
Transfer s2Member tables except wp_users

By:  Bob Kondek in: Community Forum

voices: 2
replies: 2

3 years, 8 months ago  Bob Kondek

Viewing topic 1 (of 1 total)

Topics I've Started

Viewing topic 1 (of 1 total)
Topic Count Last Reply
Transfer s2Member tables except wp_users

By:  Bob Kondek in: Community Forum

voices: 2
replies: 2

3 years, 8 months ago  Bob Kondek

Viewing topic 1 (of 1 total)

My Latest Replies (From Various Topics)

Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
Author Replies
Author Replies
Posted: Sunday May 12th, 2013 at 9:28 pm #49799
Bob Kondek
Username: iambob

Thanks GWoL,

Yes, speed is the main objective in lieu of recreating what’s captured in my spreadsheet checklist, and …

… to grab only the s2 “pieces” of the live site for occasional injection into the sandbox site without changing anything else, or as little as possible (esp. wp_users of the sandbox), adding just the fresh, clean-as-live s2 representation. Then I feel comfortable to test/experiment more to see if there’s any negative effects on s2 et.al.

So, while the remove-by-script idea is good (not my forté, but understood), if there’s just 2 or 3 tables that I really need to grab and import for this purpose, I’d tend to go this route.

Possibly this is all a bit excessive for the occasional testing/infrequent experimenting, but that’s just how I roll (til I get wiser ;-).

Appreciate the feedback,
Bob

Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)

Old Forums (READ-ONLY): The community now lives at WP Sharks™. If you have an s2Member® Pro question, please use our new Support System.

Contacting s2Member: Please use our Support Center for bug reports, pre-sale questions & technical assistance.